Hillary and Hugo have more in common than their initials and choice of careers. They both want to steal the profits of successful companies. Hillary said recently that she would take Exxon’s profits and use them for programs of her own devising. This is very hard to find on the Internet news sources because the Left finds her statement embarrassing. But she said it, and she meant it. Hugo the dictator just does it.
It is important to remember a few things about profits:
Profits are not Hillary’s to take. Income does not belong to the government.
Hillary’s proposed theft (a wrong) is not justified by the use she would put the funds (ends do not justify means).
Exxon’s profits occurred in spite of falling oil prices, indicating an adept management, not dishonesty of some kind.
Profit is not a dirty word in a capitalistic society—only to the Left.
Many “little guys” depend on the profits of Exxon and other companies for their incomes.
Profits of successful companies are already taxed twice.
If the price of success is governmental seizure, then expect a slower economy and less tax revenues. People react to governmental pressure.
Hillary’s reactionary purpose runs counter to a free society; it tells us a great deal about the real character of the woman and her Socialistic biases.
Exxon Hillary+Clinton Politics Economics Business